Can you describe how Blueprint has helped you? The more specific the better!
I'm a therapist in private practice who's interested in using AI specifically to document medical necessity and to document use of evidence-based practices for clients who use insurance. And There's a number of different types of AI that I've explored and experimented with extensively recently subscribed to and um used over many weeks, and I'm very excited about Blueprint, and there's a few reasons why. The first is that there's a a readiness to the notes that are generated both with recording sessions and with dictation, that I feel is of a much higher quality than any of the other AI platforms that I've used. It's just ready. It doesn't need a lot of tweaking and adjusting and giving the AI commands and um to to adjust things. It's exactly for the most part, um how I want it to be. One of the key parts is that the blueprint allows for this golden thread continuity of generating a treatment plan that I can edit uh with a diagnosis, with measurable goals that can be um referenced when future session nets are created. That's huge, and it's not at all universal among the AI platforms. The second thing that feels really important has to do with evidence-based treatment modalities, and blue blueprint is very, very dialed in to specific uh documentation that demonstrates that. And it also demonstrates progress with um with reference to treatment plan goals, as well as the specific content in the session. There's a very um. Smooth interaction uh with the AAI interface that seems like it kind of gets it all of the right parts, um, straightforward in terms of note generation, and visually there's just easy access to that up to the treatment plan and other elements of uh the golden thread continuity. My guess is, is that myself and many therapists specifically want to use AI because we want to be able to uh hold up or have our documentation hold up in insurance audits. And so, this emphasis that blueprint gives feels really critical. The last thing I'll say, which is not about the interface or the experience of using blueprint, has to do with the pricing structure. Um, there's both a quality of features and usage levels that feel um relevant and appreciated. Um, I like that if I'm saying I'm only gonna have 3 I'm guessing that I'm only gonna have 30 sessions in a month, that I can be at that lower tier. Pay less, and that there's no big deal if I go over and I go into 40 or 50 or 60 sessions, um, and that it automatically will uh bump up the pricing structure. Very, very uh helpful way of structuring that. So, overall, I'm very enthusiastic, um, around blueprint. I've compared a lot in great depth, um, a lot of different leading AI platforms, and for me, in my practice, this is the best fit so far.
